Användning av cookies

Lunds universitet använder cookies för att se till att webbplatsen fungerar korrekt och för att förbättra din upplevelse.

Läs mer i vår cookiepolicy

Sökresultat

Filtrera

Nollställ filter

Filtyp

Din sökning på "Konsten att dö: om döendets teologi och filosofi" gav 23849 sökträffar

Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education p

Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education pedagogy Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education pedagogy By Annika Diehl - Published 21 February 2025 Professor Katarina Mårtensson from the Department of Educational Sciences has been elected as a member of SUHF’s (the Association of Swedis

https://www.ahu.lu.se/en/article/professor-katarina-maartensson-aer-nyinvald-ledamot-i-suhfs-expertgrupp-foer-hoegskolepedagogiska-fraagor/ - 2026-06-27

Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education p

Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education pedagogy Professor Katarina Mårtensson appointed as a new member of SUHF’s expert group on higher education pedagogy By Annika Diehl - Published 21 February 2025 Professor Katarina Mårtensson from the Department of Educational Sciences has been elected as a member of SUHF’s (the Association of Swedis

https://www.uvet.lu.se/en/article/professor-katarina-maartensson-aer-nyinvald-ledamot-i-suhfs-expertgrupp-foer-hoegskolepedagogiska-fraagor/ - 2026-06-27

No title

I denna uppsats undersöks hur prisjusteringsbestämmelsen i AB 04 och AB 25 (som är avsedd att ersätta AB 04) ska tolkas, med särskilt fokus på om rekvisiten om väsentlighet och oförutsebarhet kan tolkas i ljuset av hardshipklausulerna i DCFR, UPICC och PECL. Flera författare i den juridiska litteraturen uppmärksammar likheter mellan regleringarna. De aktuella bestämmelserna, AB 04 kap. 6 § 3 och AThis thesis examines how the price adjustment provision in AB 04 and AB 25 (which is intended to replace AB 04) should be interpreted, with a particular focus on whether the provision can be interpreted in light of the hardship clauses in DCFR, UPICC and PECL. Several authors in the legal literature have noted similarities between these regulations. The relevant provisions, AB 04 Chapter 6, Sectio